Since the system called human resides in conformity to the program and you may operation regarding nature, it has been differentiated off their organisms considering the brain and you will spiritual issues articulated; however, they stayed inside a normal framework. A number of people who was basically advertised to your “universal worry about” been able to emerge, conquering that it common state identified as “individual selfness” inside the Mevlana’s exercises. Mevlana information refers to transcendent person things on higher amounts of lifetime, followed by spiritual discourses. From the distilling so it substance, it ought to be aimed to help you stress the word “common selfness” in order to bear in mind and you will internalized of the folks of the fresh suggestions decades, now import the newest “individual 4.0” phase. Category: General Research and you may Thinking
So it papers is created within the philosophical frame work out of Brahma Kumaris Community Religious College, found at Shantivan, Abu Road, Rajasthan, Asia. When that takes into account an Eternally Humane, Time Cyclical Universe, a person is end in periodic alterations in every physical program and you can the parameters – and in particular, the human brain – and its EEG. It’s estimated the basically principal Beta passion from the present-age – will be replaced of the Delta pastime into the aware and you will mindful heads. Category: General Research and you can Philosophy
Best Versus An excellent in Science
When you look at the experimental science solutions where feminine excellence is safely recommended, if at all possible connected with one to adjustable. Inside the much look routine you’ll find commonly parallel agendas of some thing but a good science: Important technology is possibly not done, or complete improperly, because the contaminated research apps commonly run mini-measurable improvements contained in this wrong paradigms, rather than the entire disease itself. Bad of all the are studies built to bolster earlier in the day paradigm mistakes. Category: General Science and you will Beliefs
Directory Particular Hands Symbol(3)
I incorporate the chief from index method of guitar handy sign. Due to the fact understanding is very simple, besides a man instead hearing and anyone with that can make full use of it. Category: General Research and Values
An email for the Size and you will The law of gravity
The principle out-of equivalence indicates this new inertial bulk means in order to gravitational bulk. Gravity is actually know with regards to the quark model, amended by the Platonic proportion. This allows in order to discuss the foundation off inertial size and you will how it should be regulated when dealing with gravity. Category: Standard Research and you will Philosophy
Resolving the fresh new Singularity of the Taking a look at the Dot and Demonstrating new Undecidability of your own Continuum Theory
Einstein’s theory of general relativity, which Newton’s theory of gravity is a part of, is fraught with the problem of singularity that has been established as a theorem by Hawking and Penrose, the later being awarded the Nobel Prize in recent years. The crucial <\it>that founds the basis of both Einstein’s and Newton’s theories of gravity is that bodies with unequal magnitudes of masses fall with the same acceleration under the gravity of a source object. Since, the validity of the Einstein’s equations is one of the assumptions based on which Hawking and Penrose have proved the theorem, therefore, the above hypothesis is implicitly one of the founding pillars of the singularity theorem. In this work, I demonstrate how one can possibly write a non-singular theory of gravity which manifests that the above mentioned hypothesis is only valid in an approximate sense in the “large distance” scenario. To mention a specific instance, under the gravity of the earth, a $5$ kg and a $500$ kg fall with accelerations which differ by approximately $\times 10^<-32>$ meter/sec$^2$ and the more massive object falls with less acceleration. Further, I demonstrate why the concept of gravitational field is not definable in the “small distance” regime which automatically justifies why the Einstein’s and Newton’s theories fail to provide any “small distance” analysis. In course of writing down this theory, I demonstrate why the continuum hypothesis as spelled out by Goedel, is undecidable. The theory has several aspects which provide the following realizations: (i) Descartes’ self-skepticism concerning exact representation of numbers by drawing lines (ii) Born’s wish of taking into account “natural uncertainty in all observations” while describing “a physical situation” by means of “real numbers” (iii) Klein’s vision of having “a fusion of arithmetic and geometry” where “a point is replaced by a small spot” (iv) Goedel’s assertion about “non-standard analysis, in some version” being “the analysis of the future”. A major drawback of this work is that it can easily appear to the authorities of modern science as too simple to believe in. This is, firstly due to the origin of the motivations being rooted to the truthfulness of the language in which physics is written and secondly due to the lucidity of the calculations involved. However, at the same time, this work can also appear as a fresh and non-standard approach to do physics from its roots, where the problem of singularity is not even there to begin with. The 
credibility of this work depends largely on whether the reader is willing adopt the second mindset. Category: General Science and Philosophy
No products in the cart.